From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zaharko v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 1976
51 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 9, 1976


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, made after a hearing, which denied petitioners' appeal contesting the issuance of a certain building permit, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 10, 1975, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The function of a court in reviewing the determination of an administrative body is limited to the question whether the conclusion arrived at by that body has any reasonable basis in fact, based upon the record before it. We perceive nothing in this record to warrant a disturbance of the conclusions of the respondent board of zoning appeals. Cohalan, Acting P.J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zaharko v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 1976
51 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Zaharko v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:PETER ZAHARKO et al., Appellants, v. NATHAN GOODMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Russo v. Zaharko

Stein again represented the defendants and the Association paid his fees and expenses. The petition was…

Pistol Clubs v. McGuire

The courts will not countermand the discretionary act of an administrative body unless the determination…