From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zagrobelny v. Kadah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiff (see, Agristor Leasing-II v. Pangburn, 162 A.D.2d 960, 961). Defendant failed to submit evidentiary proof in admissible form to show the existence of material issues of fact (see, Columbus Natl. Leasing Corp. v. Perkin-Elmer Corp., 177 A.D.2d 1035). The alleged defects that led defendant to stop payment on her checks were readily discoverable by the exercise of reasonable diligence, and thus provide no basis for her claim of fraud (see, Sirota v. Langtry, 204 A.D.2d 1009 [decided herewith]; George v. Lumbrazo, 184 A.D.2d 1050, lv dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 759).


Summaries of

Zagrobelny v. Kadah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1994
204 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Zagrobelny v. Kadah

Case Details

Full title:BRONIC J. ZAGROBELNY, Respondent, v. ANN KADAH, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 358