From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zagg Intellectual Prop. Holding Co. v. Tech 21 UK Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 11, 2017
2016-1976 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1976

04-11-2017

ZAGG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant v. TECH 21 UK LTD., Appellee

PETER M. DE JONGE, Thorpe North & Western, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by JED H. HANSEN. BREWSTER TAYLOR, Stites & Harbison PLLC, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL K. KIM.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-01262.

JUDGMENT

PETER M. DE JONGE, Thorpe North & Western, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by JED H. HANSEN. BREWSTER TAYLOR, Stites & Harbison PLLC, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL K. KIM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 11, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Zagg Intellectual Prop. Holding Co. v. Tech 21 UK Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 11, 2017
2016-1976 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Zagg Intellectual Prop. Holding Co. v. Tech 21 UK Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:ZAGG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant v. TECH 21 UK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 2017

Citations

2016-1976 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2017)