From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zagel v. Nielsen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 20, 2005
C05 01540 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2005)

Opinion

          Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP Jon Michaelson Linda Larson Usoz Philippe A. Toudic Dylan B. Carp Attorneys for Defendant STEEN NIELSEN

          Law Offices of Alan Nudelman Alan W. Nudelman Attorneys for Defendant SERVUS LIMITED

          Hopkins & Carley, A Law Corporation Robert A. Christopher Attorneys for Defendant ELLI NIELSEN

          Law Offices of Luka S. Misetic Luka S. Misetic Attorneys for Plaintiff GERTRUD ZAGEL

          McManis Faulkner & Morgan Matthew Schechter Attorneys for Plaintiff GERTRUD ZAGEL


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE

          RONALD WHYTE, District Judge.

         It is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto that:

         I. STIPULATION

         This case, including all parties and all claims for relief, shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear his/her/its own costs and his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs. The parties further acknowledge and agree that Robert Nielsen was deceased as of October 17, 2005 in Carmel, California, as evidenced by the certified copy of the Death Certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and therefore ceased to be a party to this action as of that date.

         ORDER

         Pursuant to the stipulation hereinabove, it is hereby ordered that this entire case and all parties hereto are dismissed with prejudice and that each party shall bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs.

         EXHIBIT A


Summaries of

Zagel v. Nielsen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 20, 2005
C05 01540 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Zagel v. Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUD ZAGEL, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT NIELSEN, an individual; SERVUS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 20, 2005

Citations

C05 01540 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2005)