From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zacke v. State

Supreme Court of Florioa
Apr 19, 2013
CASE NO.: SC13-396 (Fla. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC13-396 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D12-3697 Lower Tribunal No.: 05-2005-CF-31054-A

04-19-2013

CLARENCE A. ZACKE Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983). PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Couit
kb
Served:
HON. PAMELA R. MASTERS, CLERK
CLARENCE ZACKE
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
HON. MITCH NEEDELMAN, CLERK


Summaries of

Zacke v. State

Supreme Court of Florioa
Apr 19, 2013
CASE NO.: SC13-396 (Fla. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Zacke v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE A. ZACKE Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florioa

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: SC13-396 (Fla. Apr. 19, 2013)