From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zablow v. Dept. of Employment Security

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 6, 1979
398 A.2d 305 (Vt. 1979)

Summary

concluding that good cause to leave existed following repeated failure to pay wages when due

Summary of this case from Demar v. Department of Labor

Opinion

No. 343-77

Opinion Filed February 6, 1979

Unemployment Compensation — Employment Termination — By Employee With Good Cause

Employer's failure to pay employee's wages when due, coupled with three or four prior late payments, constituted good cause for employee to leave her employment and was attributable to employer, and thus not within unemployment compensation law disqualification for leaving employment without good cause attributable to employer. 21 V.S.A. § 1344.

Appeal from disqualification from unemployment compensation benefits. Employment Security Board, Kerr, Chairman, presiding. Reversed and remanded.

William G. Martin, Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., Montpelier, for Plaintiff.

Michael F. Ryan, Montpelier, for Defendant.

Present: Barney, C.J., Daley, Larrow, Billings and Hill, JJ.


This is an appeal from an order of the Vermont Employment Security Board disqualifying appellant from unemployment benefits on the ground that she had left her last employing unit voluntarily without good cause attributable to such employing unit. 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a)(2)(A). We reverse.

The plaintiff had been employed as a cashier by Levitt Industries. On three or four occasions during the course of her employment, her weekly paycheck, which was due each Friday, did not arrive on time. The checks were mailed out from a home office in another state to the local store in Vermont. On Friday, June 17, 1977, plaintiff went to the store for her paycheck, which she was depending on to pay personal bills, but once again it had not arrived. The plaintiff then called the Vermont Department of Labor and Industry. The Department's representative called plaintiff's employer and indicated that a cash "advance" should be made, and that if this was not done, the employer would be violating the law. 21 V.S.A. § 342(a). On other occasions the employer had paid other employees out of petty cash but refused to do so for the plaintiff on this occasion. The following Thursday, plaintiff gave her employer notice that she was going to quit, and terminated her employment two weeks later on July 7, 1977. A majority of the Vermont Employment Security Board disqualified plaintiff from receiving unemployment benefits.

Employers have a duty under 21 V.S.A. § 342 in addition to any they might have under their employment contracts to pay their employees in a timely manner. The characterization of the request here as being for an "advance" was error, since on the regular payday plaintiff had earned and was entitled to her wages. Failure by the employer to pay plaintiff her wages when due, coupled with the three or four prior late payments of wages, constituted good cause for plaintiff to leave and was attributable to the employer.

The order of the Employment Security Board is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a computation and award of appropriate benefits.


Summaries of

Zablow v. Dept. of Employment Security

Supreme Court of Vermont
Feb 6, 1979
398 A.2d 305 (Vt. 1979)

concluding that good cause to leave existed following repeated failure to pay wages when due

Summary of this case from Demar v. Department of Labor

explaining employer's duty under § 342 to "pay their employees in a timely manner"

Summary of this case from Stowell v. Action Moving Storage, Inc.

In Zablow v. Department of Employment Sec., 137 Vt. 8, 398 A.2d 305 (1979), an employee, on three or four occasions during employment, received tardy paychecks.

Summary of this case from Randolph v. Employment Sec. Dept
Case details for

Zablow v. Dept. of Employment Security

Case Details

Full title:Nora Zablow v. Department of Employment Security

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Feb 6, 1979

Citations

398 A.2d 305 (Vt. 1979)
398 A.2d 305

Citing Cases

Stowell v. Action Moving Storage, Inc.

This case arises out of Vermont's wages-and-medium-of-payment statutes, see 21 V.S.A. §§ 341- 347, the…

Randolph v. Employment Sec. Dept

Our research has disclosed few jurisdictions which discuss cases pertinent to this issue. In Zablow v.…