From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 25, 2013
543 F. App'x 1023 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1626

11-25-2013

JAMES E. ZABLOSKY AND KAREN ZABLOSKY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIDFIRST BANK AND MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO., Defendants-Appellees, AND SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 13-CV-0467, Senior Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth.

PER CURIAM.


ORDER

The court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed.

This appeal involves an action by James and Karen Zablosky to halt foreclosure on property located at 187 Country View Lane, Floresville, Texas. The Zabloskys appeal.

This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not appear to include jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Rather, it appears the proper forum would be the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Additionally, on September 3, 2013, the Zabloskys filed with the district court a motion to withdraw their appeal, and thus it may be that it would be unnecessary to transfer this appeal to the Fifth Circuit.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Absent objection received within 21 days of the date of this order, this appeal will be dismissed.

(2) The briefing schedule is stayed.

FOR THE COURT

___________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s25


Summaries of

Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 25, 2013
543 F. App'x 1023 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. ZABLOSKY AND KAREN ZABLOSKY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIDFIRST…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 25, 2013

Citations

543 F. App'x 1023 (Fed. Cir. 2013)