From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yuhasz v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Oct 7, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-427-FtM-2 9DNF (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-427-FtM-2 9DNF

2013-10-07

CHERISE YUHASZ, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #26), filed on September 17, 2013, recommending that the Commissioner's decision to deny social security disability benefits be affirmed. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

The Court reviews the Commissioner's decision to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence and based upon proper legal standards. Crawford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 363 F.3d 1155, 1158 (11th Cir. 2004)(citing Lewis v. Callahan, 125 F.3d 1436, 1439 (11th Cir. 1997)). Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla but less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F.3d 1208, 1211 (11th Cir. 2005)(citing Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158-59). Even if the evidence preponderates against the Commissioner's findings, the Court must affirm if the decision reached is supported by substantial evidence. Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158-59 (citing Martin v. Sullivan, 894 F.2d 1520, 1529 (11th Cir. 1990)). The Court does not decide facts anew, make credibility judgments, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner. Moore, 405 F.3d at 1211 (citing Bloodsworth v. Heckler, 703 F.2d 1233, 1239 (11th Cir. 1983)); Dyer v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 1206, 1210 (11th Cir. 2005)(citing Phillips v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1232, 1240 n.8 (11th Cir. 2004)). The Court reviews the Commissioner's conclusions of law under a de novo standard of review. Ingram v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 496 F.3d 1253, 1260 (11th Cir. 2007)(citing Martin, 894 F.2d at 1529). After an independent review, the Court agrees with the findings and recommendations in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #26) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

2. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 7th day of October, 2013.

____________

JOHN E. STEELE

United States District Judge
Copies:
Hon. Douglas N. Frazier
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Yuhasz v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Oct 7, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-427-FtM-2 9DNF (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Yuhasz v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:CHERISE YUHASZ, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-427-FtM-2 9DNF (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2013)

Citing Cases

Madsen v. Berryhill

In any event, case law in the Eleventh Circuit supports the vocational expert's opinion that Plaintiff is…