From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
3:15-cv-00262-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., DEBRA WONG YANG, MARCELLUS A. McRAE, THEANE D. EVANGELIS, DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, BRANDON J. STOKER, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP, Los Angeles, CA,

          JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK.

          SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice, ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice, LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C., Boston, MA,

          MATTHEW CARLSO, CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

          EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick, ("Defendants"), (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and agree that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for July 23, 2015 be moved to August 20, 2015, or alternatively, that the hearing be moved to July 16, 2015 and that Plaintiffs' counsel be permitted to appear by telephone:

         WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled for July 23, 2015;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' lead counsel is scheduled to be out of the country on a long-planned vacation, leaving from Boston on July 17, 2015, and returning to the United States on July 31, 2015;

         WHEREAS, the Court has a hearing scheduled on a related matter (Uber's motion to stay in the cases of Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. C-14-5200 and Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. C-14-5241), for July 16, 2015;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel is not able to appear in person on July 16, 2015, in San Francisco but could appear by telephone;

         WHEREAS, both sides' counsel are already scheduled to appear before this Court on August 20, 2015, for the Case Management Conference in this case;

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval, that:

(1) The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for July 23, 2015, is either moved to July 16, 2015, provided that Plaintiffs' counsel may appear by telephone, or alternatively,

(2) The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for July 23, 2015 is moved to August 20, 2015.

         In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

         PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The motion hearing and CMC is reset for 8/6/15 at 1:30 p.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall be filed by 7/30/15. All parties must appear in person.


Summaries of

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
3:15-cv-00262-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of all others…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

3:15-cv-00262-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)