From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yu v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0110 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0110 JAM CKD P

11-28-2012

MELVIN YU Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 8, 2012, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 22.) Petitioner has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition, within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

_______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Yu v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0110 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Yu v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN YU Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0110 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)