From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Youngs v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 17, 1997
90 N.Y.2d 843 (N.Y. 1997)

Opinion

Submitted April 21, 1997

Decided June 17, 1997


Motion by respondent County of Broome to dismiss appellant's appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that as to that respondent no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). Motion by respondents Bradley and Maslar to dismiss appellant's appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, as against respondent Maslar upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601), and as against respondent Bradley upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the consolidated action and proceeding as to him within the meaning of the Constitution.


Summaries of

Youngs v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 17, 1997
90 N.Y.2d 843 (N.Y. 1997)
Case details for

Youngs v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:DEAN YOUNGS, Also Known as and Doing Business as ELOISE SNOW HOLDING…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 17, 1997

Citations

90 N.Y.2d 843 (N.Y. 1997)
683 N.E.2d 774