Youngblood v. Youngblood

5 Citing cases

  1. Gibson v. Rustin

    297 Ga. App. 169 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 3 times

    The trial court enjoined the defendants from trespassing on the property and awarded Rustin nominal damages against each defendant, except Garrett, in the amount of $1. It did not award attorney fees, punitive damages or expenses of litigation. As noted above, if any evidence supports the finding of the trier of fact as to the location of markers in a boundary line dispute, the finding is not clearly erroneous and we will not disturb it on appeal. Youngblood v. Youngblood, 263 Ga. App. 820, 821 (1) ( 589 SE2d 602) (2003). 1. Appellants first contend that the trial court erred in finding that statements made by original grantor Johnnie Whelchel were hearsay and not probative.

  2. Huggins v. Powell

    667 S.E.2d 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 2 times

    Since Huggins does not contend that she made a request prior to entry of judgment that the trial court make specific findings of fact and state separate conclusions of law, she does not demonstrate error by the trial court. See Youngblood v. Youngblood, 263 Ga. App. 820, 821 (2) ( 589 SE2d 602) (2003). "[U]nder § 9-11-52 (c), the trial court may or may not make findings if the initial request to do so is made after the entry of judgment."

  3. Dover v. Higgins

    287 Ga. App. 861 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 4 times

    The record reveals sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding under the "any evidence" standard. Youngblood v. Youngblood, 263 Ga. App. 820, 821 (1) ( 589 SE2d 602) (2003). OCGA § 24-3-13.

  4. Black v. Mealor

    602 S.E.2d 325 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)

    Youngblood v. Youngblood.Judgment affirmed. Barnes and Mikell, JJ., concur.Youngblood v. Youngblood, 263 Ga. App. 820, 821 (2) ( 589 SE2d 602) (2003). BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

  5. Rose v. Rose

    294 Ga. 719 (Ga. 2014)   Cited 2 times

    The trial court did not err in denying wife's post-judgment request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Youngblood v. Youngblood, 263 Ga.App. 820, 821, 589 S.E.2d 602 (2003); OCGA § 9–11–52. 3. Wife contends the case was not ripe for a final hearing because husband did not complete a parenting workshop previously mandated by the trial court.