From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 14, 2022
2:18-cv-00110-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-00110-RFB-VCF

04-14-2022

BERNARD YOUNG, Petitioner v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents


ORDER

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon review of the exhibits filed in the above matter, it appears the respondents failed to comply with the redaction requirements of LR IC 6-1(a)(3). (See ECF Nos. 12-2 at 42-43, 62; 1221 at 69, 77; 12-24 at 152.) Compelling reasons exist to seal these documents because they contain personal-data identifiers, and the parties cannot change their filings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 10 days of the date of entry of this order Respondents must file a redacted publicly available copy of the documents filed as ECF Nos. 122, 12-21, and 12-24, in compliance with LR IC 6-1(a)(3).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall seal the documents filed as ECF Nos. 12-2, 12-21, and 12-24.


Summaries of

Young v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 14, 2022
2:18-cv-00110-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Young v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD YOUNG, Petitioner v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-00110-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 14, 2022)