Opinion
2:21-cv-01697-RFB-DJA
04-04-2022
LeShaun Young, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] of the Honorable Daniel J. Albregts, United States Magistrate Judge, entered December 15, 2021.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review, ” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by December 29, 2021. No. objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 4], motion to transfer to multidistrict litigation [ECF No. 5] and motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 7] are denied as moot.