From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Apr 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-0420-B (N.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-0420-B

04-18-2014

TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, 60012-001 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is BARRED by the three-strike provision. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

__________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Young v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Apr 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-0420-B (N.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Young v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, 60012-001 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 18, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-0420-B (N.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2014)

Citing Cases

Young v. United States

In addition, Plaintiff has been denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the…

Young v. Sessions

*2 (E.D. Mich. June 5, 2014) (noting that the Plaintiff "was advised by federal district judges on at least…