From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 23, 1903
75 S.W. 798 (Tex. Crim. App. 1903)

Opinion

No. 2624.

Decided June 23, 1903.

Theft by Conversion of Bailee — Indictment.

See opinion for indictment held sufficient to charge theft by a bailee, of cattle.

Appeal from the District Court of Denton. Tried below before Hon. D.E. Barrett.

Appeal from a conviction of theft of two head of cattle; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The evidence showed that Mrs. Rayborne, the owner, loaned a red cow to defendant to milk, and this cow had a calf. The defendant sold the cow and calf to one Hamilton, from whom they were recovered by the owner.

No briefs for appellant.

Howard Martin, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.


Appellant was convicted for the theft of two head of cattle, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years. The indictment contains two counts; the first charges theft generally, and the second charges conversion as hirer and bailee. The second count is as follows: That F. Young * * * "having possession of two head of cattle then and there the property of Mary Rayborne, by virtue of his contract of hiring and borrowing with the said Mary Rayborne, did then and there unlawfully and without the consent of the said Mary Rayborne, the owner thereof, fraudulently convert said two head of cattle to his, the said F. Young's, own use and benefit, and with the intent to deprive the said Mary Rayborne, the owner, of the value of the same, against the peace and dignity of the State." Appellant urges various objections to this count of the indictment. The indictment is sufficient. See White's Ann. Penal Code, sec. 1501, art. 877. Appellant requested various special charges. As far as the same were applicable to the facts of this case, they were covered by the main charge of the court. The charge of the court was very full on every phase of the evidence. The evidence is ample to support the conviction; in fact, shows beyond dispute that appellant was a hirer and bailee of the cattle, and, as such, sold the same. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Young v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 23, 1903
75 S.W. 798 (Tex. Crim. App. 1903)
Case details for

Young v. the State

Case Details

Full title:F. YOUNG v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 23, 1903

Citations

75 S.W. 798 (Tex. Crim. App. 1903)
75 S.W. 798

Citing Cases

Holland v. State

It is the announcement of the decisions that "a charge on self defense should not group a number of facts and…