From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 29, 2006
942 So. 2d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D06-3452.

November 29, 2006. Rehearing Denied November 29, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Lucy Chernow Brown, J.

Morris T. Young, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


We withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm as the motion is untimely. Appellant's conviction was final in 1999, and the current postconviction relief motion was not filed until 2006. He claims an exception to the two-year time limitation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, relying on Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), decided after his conviction, to support his contention that his plea was involuntary based upon a coerced confession. However, Seibert is an application of the Miranda decision, not the establishment of a fundamental constitutional right which has been held to apply retroactively. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b)(2).

Appellant's other claim, that his plea was based on erroneous advice of counsel, is equally barred as untimely.

Therefore, the trial court did not err in summarily denying this untimely motion.

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 29, 2006
942 So. 2d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:Morris T. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 29, 2006

Citations

942 So. 2d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Kendricks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Kendricks later made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights before he was questioned and before…

Davis v. Secretary Department of Corrections

The Court disapproved of the "question first" doctrine employed because it effectively thwarted the purpose…