From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 31, 2023
659 S.W.3d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

WD 85030

01-31-2023

John C. YOUNG, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Jeannie Willibey, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, and Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Jeannie Willibey, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, and Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, and Mark D. Pfeiffer and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. John C. Young, Jr., appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. On appeal, Mr. Young challenges the judgment as to claims of ineffectiveness of his trial counsel relating to (1) advising Mr. Young regarding his decision not to testify at trial and (2) failing to object to what Mr. Young deems to be an inconsistent verdict by the jury at his criminal trial. After a careful review of the appellate briefs and record on appeal, we find no error and affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties a memorandum of law explaining our ruling.


Summaries of

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 31, 2023
659 S.W.3d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:John C. YOUNG, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Citations

659 S.W.3d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)