Young v. State

Full title: Orlando YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Aug 27, 2019

592 S.W.3d 368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107108

08-27-2019

Orlando YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT, Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT, Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

James M. Dowd, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Orlando Young appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).