From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jun 24, 2015
123 A.3d 471 (Del. 2015)

Summary

affirming denial of fourth postconviction motion

Summary of this case from Young v. State

Opinion

No. 682 2014

06-24-2015

Adrianne R. Young, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.


ORDER

Karen L. Valihura, Justice

This 25th day of August 2015, the Court has carefully considered the appellant's counsel's opening brief filed under Supreme Court Rule 26(c), the appellant's points for the Court's consideration, and the State's response and motion to affirm. We find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated November 12, 2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the appellant's fourth motion for postconviction relief was untimely, repetitive, and previously adjudicated and that the appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Young v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jun 24, 2015
123 A.3d 471 (Del. 2015)

affirming denial of fourth postconviction motion

Summary of this case from Young v. State
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:Adrianne R. Young, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. State of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Jun 24, 2015

Citations

123 A.3d 471 (Del. 2015)
2015 WL 5032018

Citing Cases

Young v. State

(6) In short, the record fairly reflects that when denying the myriad of motions, petition, letters, and…