From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 12, 2014
448 S.W.3d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

WD 76099

2014-11-12

Dion Young, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent

Erika R. Eliason, Columbia, for AppellantShaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for Respondent


APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, THE HONORABLE EDITH MESSINA, JUDGE Erika R. Eliason, Columbia, for Appellant Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for Respondent
Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Dion Young appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 12, 2014
448 S.W.3d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dion Young, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 12, 2014

Citations

448 S.W.3d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)