From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. St. Joseph's Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 20, 1976
51 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 20, 1976

Appeal from the Wayne Supreme Court.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Simons, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff in her complaint alleges: that Brenda Young is an infant under 14 years of age and the daughter of Ardeen Young; that she was born on September 11, 1967 while her mother was under the care of the defendant physicians and the employees of the defendant hospital; that during the period of Ardeen Young's labor and the birth of Brenda Young, the defendants so negligently treated Ardeen Young that Ardeen Young suffered a cardio-respiratory arrest, resulting in severe cerebral anoxia which caused permanent brain degeneration. The infant seeks damages from defendants for the deprivation of her mother's guidance, love and support, occasioned by defendants' tortious injury of her mother. The supporting papers indicate that Ardeen Young has been decerebrate since the date of Brenda's birth and is at the present time "substantially vegetating". Brenda's father has not commenced a derivative cause of action, and in 1970 he was sentenced to a 0-20-year term of imprisonment. Brenda lives with her grandparents. The malpractice action brought on behalf of Ardeen Young, by her committee, was settled in 1973 for $125,000. Special Term granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint and for summary judgment and denied plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. We do not reach the question of whether a minor child should have a derivative claim for losses occasioned by injury to its parent by a third-party tort-feasor. At the present time recovery is universally denied in all jurisdictions of the United States which have considered the question (see Injury to Parent — Action by Child, Ann 59 ALR2d 454, 455). We affirm Special Term's order because even if we were to hold that the infant had a derivative cause of action, such actions must be joined with the main action for personal injuries (Millington v Southeastern Elevator Co., 22 N.Y.2d 498, 508; see, also, McLaughlin, Supplementary Practice Commentaries, 1969 McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 1001, pp 73-74).


Summaries of

Young v. St. Joseph's Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 20, 1976
51 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Young v. St. Joseph's Hospital

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA YOUNG, an Infant, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, VERA L. THOMAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Woodley v. State

However, he does have the excuse that he could not bring his derivative claim independently, but only as a…

Siskind v. Norris

(See, Neeson v City of Troy, 29 Hun 173.) In reaching the conclusion that precedent required the mandatory…