From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Somerset County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-387J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-387J.

September 26, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

On August 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, docket no. 6, recommending that the defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 3, be granted in part and denied in part.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2006, it is

ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 3, is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Young v. Somerset County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-387J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Young v. Somerset County

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. SOMERSET COUNTY, TIMOTHY MAPES, CAREY RANKIN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 26, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-387J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2006)