From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Mar 11, 2014
Civil Action No.1:13-2618-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No.1:13-2618-JMC

03-11-2014

Michelle Young, Plaintiff, v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC and Curtis Wilder, Sr. Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled as to defendant Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice. If settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days, either party may petition the Court to reopen this action and restore it to the calendar. Rule 60(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. In the alternative, to the extent permitted by law, either party may within sixty (60) days petition the Court to enforce the settlement. Fairfax Countywide Citizens v. Fairfax County, 571 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1978). By agreement of the parties, the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

The dismissal hereunder shall be with prejudice if no action is taken under either alternative within sixty (60) days from the filing date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MICHELLE CHILDS

United States District Judge
March 11, 2014
Columbia, South Carolina


Summaries of

Young v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Mar 11, 2014
Civil Action No.1:13-2618-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Young v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC

Case Details

Full title:Michelle Young, Plaintiff, v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC and…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No.1:13-2618-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2014)