From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 10, 2013
CASE NO. C13-5079 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-5079 BHS-JRC

05-10-2013

RICKY ANTHONY YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT RUSSELL, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 15), and Plaintiff Ricky Anthony Young's ("Young") objections to the R&R (Dkt. 20).

On April 1, 2013, Judge Creatura issued the R&R recommending that the Court deny Young's motion for a temporary restraining order. Dkt. 15. On April 17, 2013, Young filed objections arguing, in part, that he has shown irreparable injury because he is only allowed 200 pages of paper per week and does not have meaningful, unimpeded access to the law library. Dkt. 20. The Court finds that these allegations, if true, are not irreparable injury sufficient to justify injunctive relief. Moreover, there has been no showing that either the Court or Defendants have opposed any request for additional time to meet a case deadline.

Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Young's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED; and
(2) Young's motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED; and
(3) This action is RE-REFERRED for further proceedings.

_____________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Young v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 10, 2013
CASE NO. C13-5079 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:RICKY ANTHONY YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT RUSSELL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C13-5079 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. May. 10, 2013)