From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Rivers

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Dec 28, 2021
Civil Action 3:19-CV-100-KHJ-LGI (S.D. Miss. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:19-CV-100-KHJ-LGI

12-28-2021

RICK YOUNG PETITIONER v. WARDEN CHRISTOPHER RIVERS RESPONDENT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

KRISTI H JOHNSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lakeysha G. Isaac [24]. That Report recommends that the Court dismiss Young's § 2241 petition for lack of a case or controversy and because Young did not provide the Court with his current mailing address. Written objections to the Report were due by December 27, 2021. The Report notified the parties that failure to file written objections to the findings and recommendations by that date would bar further appeal in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Id.

When no party has objected to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the Court need not review it de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made.”). In such cases, the Court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

No party objected to the Report and Recommendation and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law and should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [24] of United States Magistrate Judge Lakeysha G. Isaac, entered in this cause should be, and the same is, adopted as the finding of this Court.

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

A separate Final Judgment will issue this day.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Young v. Rivers

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Dec 28, 2021
Civil Action 3:19-CV-100-KHJ-LGI (S.D. Miss. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Young v. Rivers

Case Details

Full title:RICK YOUNG PETITIONER v. WARDEN CHRISTOPHER RIVERS RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 3:19-CV-100-KHJ-LGI (S.D. Miss. Dec. 28, 2021)