Opinion
19-10729
12-20-2021
David R. Grand, Magistrate Judge
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DECEMBER 1, 2021 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [52] TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT [44, 46]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is the magistrate judge's December 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 52.) The magistrate judge recommends the Court deny Plaintiff's motions for relief from judgment. (ECF No. 44, 46.) No. party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, No. 09-10933, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120541, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the record and the pleadings. The Court agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is hereby ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motions for relief from judgment are DENIED.
SO ORDERED.