From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Ream

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 20, 2021
No. 19-10729 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

19-10729

12-20-2021

ARDRA YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. STACEY REAM, Defendant.


David R. Grand, Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DECEMBER 1, 2021 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [52] TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT [44, 46]

NANCY G. EDMUNDS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court is the magistrate judge's December 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 52.) The magistrate judge recommends the Court deny Plaintiff's motions for relief from judgment. (ECF No. 44, 46.) No. party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, No. 09-10933, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120541, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the record and the pleadings. The Court agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is hereby ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motions for relief from judgment are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Young v. Ream

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 20, 2021
No. 19-10729 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Young v. Ream

Case Details

Full title:ARDRA YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. STACEY REAM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

No. 19-10729 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2021)