Opinion
Civil Action 21-CV-2600
05-26-2023
LATIEF S. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. D.F. OBERLANDER, Respondent.
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.
AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2023, upon consideration of a Report and Recommendation that Petitioner Latief Young's Petitioner for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied (ECF No. 30), to which no objection was filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:
On January 27, 2023, Young requested an extension until February 7, 2023 to file objections, which was granted, but Young did not file objections. Although a district judge is only required to review “those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made,” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation and determined it to be correct. See Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987).
1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30) is ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability.
3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed.