Young v. McGrath

Full title: BANQUO D. YOUNG Petitioner, v. JOE McGRATH., Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 14, 2007

No. 2:03-cv-01674-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:03-cv-01674-MCE-CMK-P.

May 14, 2007

ORDER

MORRISON ENGLAND JR., District Judge

Petitioner, a state petitioner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 19, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 9, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.