From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. McGrath

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 29, 2007
Case No. 2:04-cv-00389 (JKS) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cv-00389 (JKS).

November 29, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 5, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 5, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Young v. McGrath

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 29, 2007
Case No. 2:04-cv-00389 (JKS) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2007)
Case details for

Young v. McGrath

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL WILSON YOUNG, Petitioner, v. JOE McGRATH, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 29, 2007

Citations

Case No. 2:04-cv-00389 (JKS) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2007)