From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Justice Patricia Nuñez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 12, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-12-2017

In re Shakur YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Justice Patricia NUÑEZ, etc., Respondent.

Shakur Young, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.


Shakur Young, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

TOM, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, SINGH, MOULTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Young v. Justice Patricia Nuñez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 12, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Young v. Justice Patricia Nuñez

Case Details

Full title:In re Shakur YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Justice Patricia NUÑEZ, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 12, 2017

Citations

61 N.Y.S.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)