From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. J. Pulsipher

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 9, 2006
No. 2:03-CV-2225 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:03-CV-2225 GEB KJM P.

February 9, 2006


ORDER


Defendants have requested a 28-day extension of time to March 13, 2006, to file a motion for summary judgment. Defendants have also requested that the court modify the scheduling order dates for filing pretrial statements and the pretrial conference set in the scheduling order filed May 12, 2005. This request is moot, as remaining dates in the scheduling order were vacated in this court's order of December 30, 2005.

The court finds good cause and grants defendants' request for an extension of time. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment on or before March 13, 2006.


Summaries of

Young v. J. Pulsipher

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 9, 2006
No. 2:03-CV-2225 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Young v. J. Pulsipher

Case Details

Full title:DANNY GEROME YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. J. PULSIPHER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 9, 2006

Citations

No. 2:03-CV-2225 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2006)