From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Hurst

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 7, 2010
5:09CV00027JMM/JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 7, 2010)

Opinion

5:09CV00027JMM/JTK.

June 7, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Adams, Ford-Scott, Vance, Hawkins, and Rushing (Doc. No. 94) is hereby GRANTED, and these defendants are hereby dismissed from plaintiff's complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Young v. Hurst

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 7, 2010
5:09CV00027JMM/JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Young v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:GUY B. YOUNG, ADC #124069 PLAINTIFF v. MIKE HURST, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 7, 2010

Citations

5:09CV00027JMM/JTK (E.D. Ark. Jun. 7, 2010)