From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Holmes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
No. C 09-01042 JSW (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 09-01042 JSW

05-06-2013

EARL YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. T. HOLMES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF

LAW


(Docket No. 250)

Defendants have stated that they intend to maintain their motion for judgment as a matter of law, notwithstanding the jury verdict in their favor. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his opposition brief by no later than May 24, 2013. Defendants shall file their reply brief by June 7, 2013. The Court shall resolve the matter on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Young v. Holmes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
No. C 09-01042 JSW (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:EARL YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. T. HOLMES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

No. C 09-01042 JSW (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)