From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Fruci

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 31, 2013
4 N.E.3d 363 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-31

In the Matter of Cynthia YOUNG, Appellant, v. William FRUCI et al., etc., et al., Respondents, Paul J. Sausville, Respondent.


Reported below, 112 A.D.3d 1138, 976 N.Y.S.2d 710.

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value ( see Matter of Marchant v. Mead–Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297–298, 169 N.E. 386 [1929] [Cardozo, Ch. J.] ).


Summaries of

Young v. Fruci

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 31, 2013
4 N.E.3d 363 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Fruci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Cynthia YOUNG, Appellant, v. William FRUCI et al., etc.…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 31, 2013

Citations

4 N.E.3d 363 (N.Y. 2013)
22 N.Y.3d 1037
981 N.Y.S.2d 352
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 95438