Although the plaintiff did not testify that he worked an average of ten hours a day, there was other evidence from which the jury could find that he did. A finding that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, or that it was so excessive as to show partiality or prejudice was not required by the record. See Young v. Dow, 93 N.H. 210. It is not the practice in this state to require a retrial of issues as to which no error has been committed, if they can be separated from issues as to which error did occur.

There were no requests for findings and it is not necessary for the defendant to be able to point out the exact method by which the Court reached its verdict since it cannot be said that it is not in accordance with the evidence. See Young v. Dow, 93 N.H. 210, 212. It follows the plaintiff's exception must be overruled and the order is Judgment on the verdict.