From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Corning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

April, 1918.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Shearn, JJ.


The original order to make the complaint more definite and certain, dated December 10, 1917, has not been appealed from. This appeal is merely from an order denying a motion for a reargument, which is not appealable. The appeal, therefore, should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Motion denied.


Summaries of

Young v. Corning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

Young v. Corning

Case Details

Full title:ANNA F. YOUNG, Appellant, v. MABEL M. CORNING, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1918

Citations

183 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Citing Cases

Kelmenson v. Boulevard Construction Corporation

( Besas v. Slobodoff, 129 Misc. 205.)" ( More Realty Corp. v. Mootchnick, ante, p. 705, decided by this court…

Glines v. Glines

March, 1931. Appeal from so much of order dated June 27, 1930, as denies motion for reargument dismissed upon…