From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Convergys Customer Mgmt. Grp.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug 26, 2014
439 S.W.3d 819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100894.

2014-08-26

Carmen YOUNG, Appellant, v. CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 13–18240 R–A. Carmen Young, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent Acting Pro Se.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 13–18240 R–A.
Carmen Young, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent Acting Pro Se.
Christine K. Lesicko, Div. of Employment Serv., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Carmen Young appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) finding she did not show good cause for filing a late appeal of the determination that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We find that no abuse of discretion has occurred.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Young v. Convergys Customer Mgmt. Grp.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug 26, 2014
439 S.W.3d 819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Young v. Convergys Customer Mgmt. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:Carmen YOUNG, Appellant, v. CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP INC. and…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Date published: Aug 26, 2014

Citations

439 S.W.3d 819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)