From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Colbath

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 12, 1990
559 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-0622.

March 21, 1990. Rehearing Denied April 12, 1990.

Petition for writ of prohibition.

Charles L. Young, West Palm Beach, prose.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.


By order dated March 9, 1990, this court determined that the pleading filed by petitioner, entitled petition for writ of prohibition, should be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Now upon further consideration of the pro se petition, as amended, and the response, we are of the opinion that correctly the petition should be denominated as petition for writ of prohibition and, accordingly, that part of the order dated March 9, 1990, providing otherwise is hereby rescinded.

The amended petition of writ of prohibition is

DENIED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Young v. Colbath

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 12, 1990
559 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Young v. Colbath

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES L. YOUNG, PETITIONER, v. WALTER COLBATH, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 12, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)