From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Caraway

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 7, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1476 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Mar. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Civ. No. 05-1476 (JNE/JJG).

March 7, 2006


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 12, 2006. The magistrate judge recommended that Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be granted and that Petitioner's motion for writ of mandamus be denied as moot. Petitioner and Respondent objected separately to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Docket No. 1] is GRANTED.
2. Respondent shall reconsider the date when Petitioner should be assigned to a Community Correctives Center or home confinement in light of the criteria set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b) and without regard to 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-.21.
3. Petitioner's motion for writ of mandamus [Docket No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Young v. Caraway

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 7, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1476 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Mar. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Young v. Caraway

Case Details

Full title:Michael Young, Petitioner, v. Warden J.F. Caraway, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

Civ. No. 05-1476 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Mar. 7, 2006)

Citing Cases

Sankey v. Morrison

The issues presented have been fully explored by several District Court decisions, in this District, which…

Ramos v. Fisher

It is true that exhaustion is not required when the pursuit of administrative remedies would be futile. See…