Opinion
Case No. C05-5565RBL.
February 1, 2006
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION
This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has not yet been granted in forma pauperis status and an order to show cause is pending. (Dkt., # 13). There are two motions in the file which the court will consider while the in forma pauperis issue is pending.
On October 28th, 2005 a motion for clarification was filed with an incorrect cause number. That motion was filed by ANDRE BRIGHAM YOUNG. (Dkt. # 8). Andre Brigham Young is not a plaintiff in this action and this pleading appears to be intended for a different case. The pleading will not be considered in this action.
The second motion is a motion for clarification filed by the plaintiff in this action. (Dkt. # 12). Plaintiff asks for clarification that defendant Baur will not represent defendant Miller. (Dkt. # 12).
Normally a court will not consider motions until preliminary issues such as the plaintiff's filing status are concluded. The motion for clarification does not raise either a legal or factual issue for determination by this court and is therefore DENIED.
The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Plaintiff and remove docket entries 8 and 12 from the court's calendar.