From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Barthlow

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6003.

Submitted: February 21, 2008.

Decided: February 27, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00662-RWT).

Clayton E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Clayton E. Young appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants on his complaint that alleged violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2000), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 504 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Barthlow, No. 8:07-cv-00662-RWT (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Young v. Barthlow

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Young v. Barthlow

Case Details

Full title:Clayton E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie BARTHLOW, Facility…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2008)