From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Administrator

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 15, 2009
983 A.2d 303 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009)

Opinion

(AC 30940)

Argued November 19, 2009

Officially released December 15, 2009

Plaintiff's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Waterbury, Alvord, J.


Practice Book § 22-4 provides a mechanism for the correction of a board's factual findings. The plaintiff's failure to file a timely motion to correct prevented the trial court from reviewing facts found by the board, and it is bound by them. See JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422, 828 A.2d 609 (2003).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Young v. Administrator

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 15, 2009
983 A.2d 303 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009)
Case details for

Young v. Administrator

Case Details

Full title:BARRY YOUNG v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 15, 2009

Citations

983 A.2d 303 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009)
118 Conn. App. 904