From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Youlin Wang v. Kahn

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 11, 2022
20-cv-08033-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-08033-BLF

08-11-2022

YOULIN WANG, Petitioner, v. RICHARD KAHN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN AS TO FORENSIC PROFESSIONALS GROUP, USA, INC

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 11, 2022, the Court heard and granted Douglas E. Klein's motion to withdraw as counsel for Respondents Richard Kahn and Forensic Professionals Group, USA, Inc. (“FGP”). At the hearing, Mr. Kahn informed the Court that he intended to represent himself pro se. Mr. Kahn also represented, as FGP's agent, that he did not intend to obtain counsel for Respondent FGP, which, as a corporation, cannot represent itself. Civil L.R. 3-9(b); see also, e.g., Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993).

Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and before August 25, 2022, why the answer (ECF No. 91) should not be stricken with respect to Respondent FGP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Youlin Wang v. Kahn

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 11, 2022
20-cv-08033-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Youlin Wang v. Kahn

Case Details

Full title:YOULIN WANG, Petitioner, v. RICHARD KAHN, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 11, 2022

Citations

20-cv-08033-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2022)