From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yosevitz v. Kahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1993
199 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 27, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff did not make a prima facie showing that she had sustained a serious injury. Accordingly, the court properly granted the separate motions of the defendant Michael Kahan and the defendant Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Licari v Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Yosevitz v. Kahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1993
199 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Yosevitz v. Kahan

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL YOSEVITZ, Appellant, v. MICHAEL KAHAN et al., Respondents, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 94