From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yorsch v. Pierce

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 8, 2013
NO. 2013 CW 1263 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 2013 CW 1263

2013-10-08

KHRISTINE YORSCH INDIVIDUALLY, AND DAVID ARANDA ON BEHALF OF THE MINOR CHILDREN RAYEL ARANDA, KEELEE ARANDA AND DAVID ARANDA, JR. v. NANCY PIERCE, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY


In Re: Nancy Pierce and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2012-14161.

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., AND CRAIN, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

WJC

VGW

WELCH, J., concurs. While I believe the requested discovery was overly broad, a more narrowed, tailored discovery request, even if the site was marked as private, is discoverable. Further, had an in camera inspection been requested, it would lead, in my mind, to a different result. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT _______________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Yorsch v. Pierce

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 8, 2013
NO. 2013 CW 1263 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Yorsch v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:KHRISTINE YORSCH INDIVIDUALLY, AND DAVID ARANDA ON BEHALF OF THE MINOR…

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 8, 2013

Citations

NO. 2013 CW 1263 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2013)