From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yoast v. Borough

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 21, 2022
Civil Action 19-720 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-720

03-21-2022

TERRENCE R. YOAST, Plaintiff, v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

AND NOW, this 21st day of March 2022, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Primecare Medical, Inc. and Anthony Hoch, [Doc. No. 131], the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Correctional Officer VanDorick, Correctional Officer Stein, and Montgomery County [Doc. No. 133], Plaintiff's responses thereto, and Defendants' replies, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motions are GRANTED and all claims in the Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yoast v. Borough

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 21, 2022
Civil Action 19-720 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Yoast v. Borough

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE R. YOAST, Plaintiff, v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 19-720 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2022)