Yoakum v. Wells Fargo Bank

Full title: TWAUNA YOAKUM and RHODEAN DEBNAM, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

CV 09-1114-JE (D. Or. Apr. 21, 2011)

Opinion

CV 09-1114-JE.

April 21, 2011

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES REDDEN, Senior District Judge

On March 30, 2011, Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed his Findings and Recommendation (doc. 50) that the court deny defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association's motion to strike, but grant its motion for summary judgment and enter judgment in Wells Fargo's favor.

The matter is now before this court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Neither party timely filed objections. This relieves me of my obligation to review Magistrate Judge Jelderks' factual findings de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings and Recommendation (doc. 50) as my own opinion. I DENY Wells Fargo's motion to strike (doc. 38), but GRANT its motion for summary judgment (doc. 20) and DISMISS this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 20 day of April, 2011.