Opinion
DOCKET NO. A-3293-10T3
01-23-2012
August J. Landi, attorney for appellant. Frank E. Tournour, attorney for respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
Before Judges Parrillo and Skillman.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Middlesex County, Docket No. FM-12-1942-04F.
August J. Landi, attorney for appellant.
Frank E. Tournour, attorney for respondent. PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals from post-judgment orders entered on December 17, 2010 and February 18, 2011, which compelled him to drive the daughter of his marriage to plaintiff to her piano, karate and drawing lessons during his parenting time and denied his application to be allowed to enroll his daughter in a piano class near his home in Edison to attend during his parenting time. Our review of such rulings is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its discretion. See Cesare v. Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 411-16 (1998). We are satisfied, substantially for the reasons set forth in the December 17, 2010 and February 18, 2011 orders, that the trial court's rulings challenged in this appeal did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Defendant's arguments do not warrant any additional discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).
Affirmed.
I hereby certify that the foregoing
is a true copy of the original on
file in my office.
CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION