From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yin Yang Harmony Acupuncture, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jan 17, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2017-1134 N C

01-17-2019

YIN YANG HARMONY ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., as Assignee of Rene Marcelin, Respondent, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant. Russell Friedman & Associates, LLP (Dara C. Goodman of counsel), for respondent.


The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant.

Russell Friedman & Associates, LLP (Dara C. Goodman of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, J.P., BRUCE E. TOLBERT, JERRY GARGUILO, JJ

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (James M. Darcy, J.), dated April 25, 2017. The order denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $ 30 costs, and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 is granted.

In March 2011, plaintiff commenced this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. Defendant interposed an answer in April 2011. Over five years later, in November 2016, defendant served a 90-day written demand pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3), which was received by plaintiff on November 21, 2016. On March 22, 2017, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3216, as defendant had not been served with a notice of trial. On March 29, 2017, plaintiff served defendant with a notice of trial. Plaintiff's counsel's affirmation in opposition to defendant's motion stated that plaintiff's "delay in responding to [defendant's] 90-day notice was neither willful nor contumacious, and does not evidence an intent to abandon the action." By order dated April 25, 2017, the District Court denied the motion.

For the reasons stated in Schottenstein Pain & Neuro, PLLC, as Assignee of Bamidele Adebisi v. GEICO Ins. Co. (––– Misc 3d ––––, 2019 NY Slip Op –––– [appeal No. 2017-1131 N C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 is granted.

RUDERMAN, J.P., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Yin Yang Harmony Acupuncture, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jan 17, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Yin Yang Harmony Acupuncture, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Yin Yang Harmony Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Rene Marcelin…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Jan 17, 2019

Citations

62 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 50086
112 N.Y.S.3d 864